Disclaimer and Caution:

Welcome. Before you proceed with whatsoever, please read the article on fallibilism and fallacies that you may comprehend the basis of statements and arguments this blog may espouse on. I'll point out what this blog is not intended for, followed by what it is. The word "blog" is taken in the context of Google's definition.


This blog is not intended for profit.


This blog is not intended for amassing pageviews, cyberlinks, page rankings, popularity etc.


This blog is not intended to serve as a channel for those whose objectives may consist of which I had disclaimed.


The comments link on individual articles had been removed to encourage readers to vent out their opinions via my "overall rating page" instead, which can be accessed by clicking here.


Though the essense of my articles may be founded on some philosophical doctrines, this blog is not intended to promote any. Neither to debate on the fallibility nor infallibility of another.


This blog is based on the English language. Meticulous effort had been exerted as to correct grammar and syntax in order for one adept in the same to comprehend this in the context of its original intention of writing.


This blog may also espouse on other philosophical doctrines especially that on logic, critical thinking and pragmatic maxim. My objective being for one to transcend beyond a "straight line of sight" unto a "multi-parallax" perception of reality. This transcending may involve parallaxes beyond what one may consider as a physical state.

The word "metaphysical" would be used lossely to pertain to that which are potential, intangible, non-physical, before or beyond what is physically perceivable by our brain. Not necessarily as only being "meta" or "after".

The "internalist" and "externalist" theories were contradicted based on my perceptive reality, that is "physical" being a product of non-physical, not the other way around.

The title of my blog ends with a question mark thereby allowing the mind a way out. If you do not agree with being fallible, it is only logical that you DO NOT continue reading my articles. To continue reading may subliminally set off your mind to doubt your claim to infallibility and put you up for a challenge to prove yourself or me wrong. Alternatively, your subconscious mind may be triggered further by your skeptical reading, causing time and space displacements of your perceptive reality. Eventually, you may find yourself becoming a subject matter of the same articles which I wrote, but that you found most disagreeable.


For those who find wisdom in my articles, please continue reading but only up to the point where you may disagree with me, then stop or switch topics. It is not the objective of my blog to prove whomever wrong nor right, rather to enlighten one on the many possibilities and choices if only one can master the will or mind.
Philosophy Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Traffic Jams

There is a saying, the way a nation's people drive and manage traffic very much reflect their logic, intelligence and emotional quotient, hence to a certain extent, reflect the way they manage their lives. The basic causes of traffic jams, believe it or not are, stupidity (assumed intelligence), apathy (indifference) and lifestyle (the time most people used the road). Combining the above three elements will spontaneously result to a horrendous traffic jam. Why? Because the above three elements will guarantee a physical occurrence that is, a road clog or obstruction. Huge amount of resources are continuously wasted on traffic management but the root cause of traffic jams which more than neglected, is the human factor. The driving culture of the brain behind the wheel is the culprit.


Let's comprehend the logic and physical attributes of traffic. These physical elements has something to do with time, space and motion. Size of roads, number of vehicles, and the time a vehicle enter and stays on the road. Varying the ratio of any above will inevitably affect traffic. Because road traffic is linear, affecting one will invariably affect the entire length behind.

To cite a scenario. When an obstruction occurs in a main street when there are very few vehicles occupying such, the effect on traffic may not be noticeable, as there are plenty of road space for other vehicles to occupy. Hence the justification for traffic tolerance. But as more vehicles coincidentally take the road, these pile up for space waiting for the prior ones to exit. The obstruction is now in effect delaying the exit of other vehicles who entered earlier. As the ratio of vehicles entering outnumber those which are leaving, traffic slows down. You don't have to be a mathematics expert to know that compounding the time element with the vehicle to road ratio will give you the outcome of a traffic jam.

So there you go. Unless no alternative, avoid the roads when most people are using it. Move your butt once you're in. The traffic clog you create will delay everyone which on overall effect will delay you on your way back. Driving too fast may be riskier, but driving too slow runs the risk of being ran over. For those who habitually create clogs, pray not the day a tank will come your way.

Check out my article Worst case of stupidity

Rate my blog?

But have you read the older posts from my blog archives? Vent out your opinions via my "overall rating page", which can be accessed by clicking here.