Disclaimer and Caution:

Welcome. Before you proceed with whatsoever, please read the article on fallibilism and fallacies that you may comprehend the basis of statements and arguments this blog may espouse on. I'll point out what this blog is not intended for, followed by what it is. The word "blog" is taken in the context of Google's definition.


This blog is not intended for profit.


This blog is not intended for amassing pageviews, cyberlinks, page rankings, popularity etc.


This blog is not intended to serve as a channel for those whose objectives may consist of which I had disclaimed.


The comments link on individual articles had been removed to encourage readers to vent out their opinions via my "overall rating page" instead, which can be accessed by clicking here.


Though the essense of my articles may be founded on some philosophical doctrines, this blog is not intended to promote any. Neither to debate on the fallibility nor infallibility of another.


This blog is based on the English language. Meticulous effort had been exerted as to correct grammar and syntax in order for one adept in the same to comprehend this in the context of its original intention of writing.


This blog may also espouse on other philosophical doctrines especially that on logic, critical thinking and pragmatic maxim. My objective being for one to transcend beyond a "straight line of sight" unto a "multi-parallax" perception of reality. This transcending may involve parallaxes beyond what one may consider as a physical state.

The word "metaphysical" would be used lossely to pertain to that which are potential, intangible, non-physical, before or beyond what is physically perceivable by our brain. Not necessarily as only being "meta" or "after".

The "internalist" and "externalist" theories were contradicted based on my perceptive reality, that is "physical" being a product of non-physical, not the other way around.

The title of my blog ends with a question mark thereby allowing the mind a way out. If you do not agree with being fallible, it is only logical that you DO NOT continue reading my articles. To continue reading may subliminally set off your mind to doubt your claim to infallibility and put you up for a challenge to prove yourself or me wrong. Alternatively, your subconscious mind may be triggered further by your skeptical reading, causing time and space displacements of your perceptive reality. Eventually, you may find yourself becoming a subject matter of the same articles which I wrote, but that you found most disagreeable.


For those who find wisdom in my articles, please continue reading but only up to the point where you may disagree with me, then stop or switch topics. It is not the objective of my blog to prove whomever wrong nor right, rather to enlighten one on the many possibilities and choices if only one can master the will or mind.
Philosophy Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Do you rant?

The dictionary defines rant (noun) as a loud, wild and extravagant speech. Kinda sound familiar. But why does one rant? A rant is basically a form of expressing the inexpressible in one's perceptive reality. This may be an approval or disapproval of something one has no control of, neither is willing or has an understanding for. When a person rants, one is actually complaining to the ego for not being able to comprehend nor empathize with such. The loudness is not to deafen others, rather to deafen oneself from others. Because one is responsible of perceptive reality, the act of ranting is implicitly a disapproval of the way one manages life or how it turns out to be. The deafening rant sort of assures the ego is right, there's no other way, others are wrong. Moreover, ranting expresses insecurity and weakness as wild and loud voice needs to be utilized to assure self-righteousness. Ranting betrays superficiality as the act surmises that others are devoid of an equal or discern opinion.

Check out my article "Do you love to wish?"

Friday, April 11, 2008

Do you love the sun?

The sun. This intense and immense fireball of nuclear fusion which light, heat and gives life to mother nature also kills humans. As with the principle of yin and yang, all things balanced out by itself. Every bit of radiation produced by the sun kills the human living tissue as much as it gives life to nature. That soever life the sun gave to nature, depleted by humans, replenished by the sun. Unless you are not human, the sunlight you love basking on under the scorching heat actually deplete, age and kills you by the bit. Only in the medical field, a physician may request for a newborn diagnosed with jaundice or icterus to be exposed to early sunrise as a vitamin D replenishment.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

News and Advertisements

That soever used to promote a concept, product, company, person, entity etc is called an advertisement. Ironically, advertisements are dispensed via the worst ongoing of a nation, the news. If one seek that soever said so evil of a people and its culture, it's the news. The news unwittingly betray whatsoever advertisements promote. If you want to know how crazy a nation is, simply scan the local news. Citizens consecrate patriotism not cognitive of the worst disservice a nation may succumb to via its daily news.

Check out my article Craziness and relationships

Rate my blog?

But have you read the older posts from my blog archives? Vent out your opinions via my "overall rating page", which can be accessed by clicking here.