Disclaimer and Caution:

Welcome. Before you proceed with whatsoever, please read the article on fallibilism and fallacies that you may comprehend the basis of statements and arguments this blog may espouse on. I'll point out what this blog is not intended for, followed by what it is. The word "blog" is taken in the context of Google's definition.


This blog is not intended for profit.


This blog is not intended for amassing pageviews, cyberlinks, page rankings, popularity etc.


This blog is not intended to serve as a channel for those whose objectives may consist of which I had disclaimed.


The comments link on individual articles had been removed to encourage readers to vent out their opinions via my "overall rating page" instead, which can be accessed by clicking here.


Though the essense of my articles may be founded on some philosophical doctrines, this blog is not intended to promote any. Neither to debate on the fallibility nor infallibility of another.


This blog is based on the English language. Meticulous effort had been exerted as to correct grammar and syntax in order for one adept in the same to comprehend this in the context of its original intention of writing.


This blog may also espouse on other philosophical doctrines especially that on logic, critical thinking and pragmatic maxim. My objective being for one to transcend beyond a "straight line of sight" unto a "multi-parallax" perception of reality. This transcending may involve parallaxes beyond what one may consider as a physical state.

The word "metaphysical" would be used lossely to pertain to that which are potential, intangible, non-physical, before or beyond what is physically perceivable by our brain. Not necessarily as only being "meta" or "after".

The "internalist" and "externalist" theories were contradicted based on my perceptive reality, that is "physical" being a product of non-physical, not the other way around.

The title of my blog ends with a question mark thereby allowing the mind a way out. If you do not agree with being fallible, it is only logical that you DO NOT continue reading my articles. To continue reading may subliminally set off your mind to doubt your claim to infallibility and put you up for a challenge to prove yourself or me wrong. Alternatively, your subconscious mind may be triggered further by your skeptical reading, causing time and space displacements of your perceptive reality. Eventually, you may find yourself becoming a subject matter of the same articles which I wrote, but that you found most disagreeable.


For those who find wisdom in my articles, please continue reading but only up to the point where you may disagree with me, then stop or switch topics. It is not the objective of my blog to prove whomever wrong nor right, rather to enlighten one on the many possibilities and choices if only one can master the will or mind.

Friday, January 26, 2007

Worst case of stupidity

What is stupidity? Stupidity is the inability of a brain to be coherent with circumstances, resulting to unwarranted oversights and displacements. Several types of stupidity plagued our network of minds as lack of comprehension, insensitivity, clumsiness, forgetfulness, irrationality, retardation, gullibility and fallibility, each to their respective levels in severity. The overly simplified excuses to vindicate oneself would be "one is only human" and "nobody is perfect". As with any imperfections in life, the unforgiving level would be breached when one is no longer responsive for any improvement either due to an inability of learning or stubbornness. The worst case of stupidity would be - when one is totally unaware that he or she is guilty of such verdict.

Posted by Vic Coling at 12:07:00 AM

Labels:

Rate my blog?

But have you read the older posts from my blog archives? Vent out your opinions via my "overall rating page", which can be accessed by clicking here.